{"id":5993,"date":"2023-05-13T18:02:55","date_gmt":"2023-05-13T22:02:55","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/hedgehogsandfoxes.org\/?p=5993"},"modified":"2023-05-13T18:02:55","modified_gmt":"2023-05-13T22:02:55","slug":"smith-on-originalism-and-the-meaning-of-twenty-dollars-msmith750-uidaholaw-creightonlawrev","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/hedgehogsandfoxes.org\/index.php\/2023\/05\/13\/smith-on-originalism-and-the-meaning-of-twenty-dollars-msmith750-uidaholaw-creightonlawrev\/","title":{"rendered":"Smith on Originalism and the Meaning of &#8220;Twenty Dollars&#8221; @msmith750 @uidaholaw @CreightonLawRev"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Michael L. Smith, University of Idaho College of Law, is publishing <a href=\"https:\/\/papers.ssrn.com\/sol3\/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4420394\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Originalism and the Meaning of &#8216;Twenty Dollars&#8217;<\/a> in volume 56 of the Creighton Law Review. Here is the abstract.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Originalism claims to provide answers, or at least assistance, for those hoping to interpret a Constitution filled with wide-ranging, morally loaded terminology. Originalists claim that looking to the original public meaning of the Constitution will constrain interpreters, maintain consistency and predictability in judicial decisions, and is faithful to ideals like democratic legitimacy. This essay responds with the inevitable, tough question: whether originalism can tell interpreters what the Seventh Amendment\u2019s reference to \u201ctwenty dollars\u201d means\u2014both as a matter of original meaning and for interpreters today.<\/p>\n<p>While this appears to be an easy question, I demonstrate that rather than telling modern legal actors what \u201ctwenty dollars\u201d means, originalism instead leads to a range of highly divergent possibilities. The original meaning of \u201ctwenty dollars\u201d\u2014applied today\u2014may mean anywhere from twenty modern dollars, to a little under four hundred dollars, to just about seven thousand dollars. In doing so, I illustrate high-level debates between originalists and their critics, and how these debates tend to stray away from the needs of actual actors. Originalist appeals to construction and distinguishing semantic and legal meaning are cold comfort to the hapless attorney or judge who just wants to know what \u201ctwenty dollars\u201d means. Moreover, if originalism cannot tell modern legal actors what \u201ctwenty dollars\u201d means, there\u2019s little hope that it will provide meaningful assistance in resolving questions over broader, loaded terms like \u201cdue process,\u201d \u201ccruel and unusual punishment,\u201d \u201cequal protection,\u201d and other provisions that draw the bulk of scholarly attention and constitutional litigation.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Download the article from SSRN at the link.<\/p>\n\n<div class=\"twitter-share\"><a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/intent\/tweet?via=HedgehogsFoxes\" class=\"twitter-share-button\">Tweet<\/a><\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Michael L. Smith, University of Idaho College of Law, is publishing Originalism and the Meaning of &#8216;Twenty Dollars&#8217; in volume 56 of the Creighton Law Review. Here is the abstract. Originalism claims to provide&#46;&#46;&#46;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[272,894],"tags":[541,896,895],"class_list":["post-5993","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-legal-interpretation","category-seventh-amendment","tag-legal-interpretation","tag-originalism","tag-seventh-amendment"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/pasVL2-1yF","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/hedgehogsandfoxes.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5993","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/hedgehogsandfoxes.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/hedgehogsandfoxes.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hedgehogsandfoxes.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hedgehogsandfoxes.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5993"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/hedgehogsandfoxes.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5993\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":5994,"href":"https:\/\/hedgehogsandfoxes.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5993\/revisions\/5994"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/hedgehogsandfoxes.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5993"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hedgehogsandfoxes.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5993"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hedgehogsandfoxes.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5993"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}