Iskandar on The Strange Case of a Written Constitution @PranotoIskandar
Pranoto Iskandar, Institute for Migrant Rights; McGill University, Centre for Human Rights and Legal Pluralism, has published The Strange Case of a Written Constitution: Symbolism in Constitution. Here is the abstract.
This proposed study is aimed to explicate the practice of symbolism in a constitution. As a conceptual model, the notion of symbolic constitutionalism is a constitutional system that sees constitutions as no different from a symbol that represents something, other than itself. And more often than not, the connection between the symbol and what it represents is not so obvious, if nonexistent. As the Indonesian case shows, this model of a constitutional system is prominently based on a set of legal assumptions that are implicit and, thus, subjective, in nature. That said, the expressive nature of such a constitution is mostly related with the invocation of the sentimental aspect of the document that exists in the realm of the nation’s cultural details and superstitious past. In this regard, this symbolic role is supposedly emitting its constitutional meaning from the outside or beyond of, and certainly, not within, the four corners. Differently put, any attempts to expound constitutional intentions from such a constitution should take into context writ large. As a consequence, in its effort, this study proposes that the implicit meaning can only be elucidated with significant help of non-textual sources.
Download the article from SSRN at the link.